Study Result
Logotype for Equillium Inc

Equillium (EQ) Study Result summary

Event summary combining transcript, slides, and related documents.

Logotype for Equillium Inc

Study Result summary

26 Dec, 2025

Study design and patient population

  • Phase III EQUATOR study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating itolizumab in 158 patients with first-line acute GVHD, including those with severe disease (grade 3/4 or grade 2 with lower GI involvement).

  • Patients received itolizumab or placebo plus high-dose corticosteroids within three days, dosed every other week for up to three months, with follow-up to Day 365.

  • Median age was 59 years (range 18–75), with balanced sex and regional distribution; 92% had lower GI involvement and 55.7% were Minnesota High Risk.

  • Study included 150–158 patients, with participation from 9 of the top 10 transplant centers and nearly 40% of patients from the U.S.

Efficacy outcomes

  • Primary endpoint (CR at Day 29) was not met: CR rates were 43% for itolizumab vs. 48% for placebo (not statistically significant).

  • Durable CR at Day 99 was 29% for itolizumab vs. 16% for placebo; among Day 29 CRs, 67.6% (itolizumab) vs. 34.2% (placebo) maintained CR (p=0.005).

  • CR at Day 99 achieved statistical significance: 44.9% for itolizumab vs. 28.6% for placebo (p=0.035).

  • Median duration of CR was 336 days for itolizumab vs. 72 for placebo (p=0.017); failure-free survival was 154 vs. 70 days (p=0.043).

  • Overall survival at 1 year trended favorably for itolizumab (66.7% vs. 49.6%), though not statistically significant.

Safety and tolerability

  • Itolizumab showed a favorable safety profile, with no increase in infection or sepsis risk compared to placebo.

  • TEAEs occurred in 98.7% (itolizumab) and 96.1% (placebo); serious TEAEs in 57.7% (itolizumab) and 61.0% (placebo).

  • TEAEs leading to death: 23.1% (itolizumab) vs. 32.5% (placebo); none were treatment-related.

  • AE-related discontinuations were infrequent and mostly due to infusion reactions; TEAEs leading to discontinuation were higher with itolizumab (12.8% vs. 3.9%).

  • No significant difference in steroid tapering, primary disease relapse, or chronic GVHD rates between arms.

Partial view of Summaries dataset, powered by Quartr API
AI can get things wrong. Verify important information.
All investor relations material. One API.
Learn more